Tradytics

Stock Screener — Paid

An AI analytics platform bundling options flow, dark-pool data, and machine-learning signals into one affordable scanner.

ML market direction signals

Overview

Tradytics is a stock screener and analytics platform built for intermediate active traders who want options flow, dark-pool data, and machine-learning signals in one dashboard. This Tradytics review covers what you get for the price and where the platform asks more of you in return. It's built for traders who want several AI-driven data categories in a single product instead of piecing together separate tools.

The appeal is breadth. Tradytics's models surface bullish and bearish setups, unusual activity, and overall market direction, translating raw order flow into interpreted signals instead of dumping raw data on the user. It also tracks congressional trades alongside its options flow and dark-pool data. Packing all of that into one product at $69/mo is genuinely affordable next to buying separate tools for each data type, and a free trial lets you test the workflow before committing to a monthly charge.

The signals still need confirmation. Tradytics interprets data, but it doesn't replace a trader's own judgment on when to act, and treating any single signal as gospel is a mistake that will cost money. The interface is also busy, packing in enough data categories that new users need real time to learn where everything lives before the platform actually speeds up their process instead of slowing it down. It rewards traders who already know how to read options flow rather than teaching the concept from scratch.

Coverage runs across US stocks and options, built for day trading with semi-automated features and API access for traders who want to connect it to their own systems, plus a mobile app for monitoring flow away from the desk. Intermediate active traders who already understand options flow and want more of it in one place are the target user. Beginners who need a simpler, single-purpose screener, or anyone unwilling to confirm signals with their own research, should consider a lighter tool instead.

Pros

Cons